<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dr. Kirsty&#8217;s Google Filter Diagnosis &#8211; More Site Problems!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/</link>
	<description>Affiliate marketing news &#038; articles for newbies and pros by Kirsty McCubbin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:22:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Your Google Penalty is Gone? Are You SURE?! &#187; UK Affiliate Marketing Blog - Kirsty's Affiliate Marketing Guide - Affiliate Stuff UK</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-4336</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Your Google Penalty is Gone? Are You SURE?! &#187; UK Affiliate Marketing Blog - Kirsty's Affiliate Marketing Guide - Affiliate Stuff UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/?p=174#comment-4336</guid>
		<description>[...] many of you will remember I had a bit of bother in the middle of last year with a Google Over Optimisation penalty on my Lingerie site.  I documented the trials and tribulations of the whole thing, and was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] many of you will remember I had a bit of bother in the middle of last year with a Google Over Optimisation penalty on my Lingerie site.  I documented the trials and tribulations of the whole thing, and was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fethiye</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-4171</link>
		<dc:creator>Fethiye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/?p=174#comment-4171</guid>
		<description>I suffer from the same thing...my blog, ablosutely clean and original, regularly indexed but dont appear by keywords in searches anymore...though google web master says all the pages are indexed, i think i am on filter but what is the reson i dont understand. I never sell links...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suffer from the same thing&#8230;my blog, ablosutely clean and original, regularly indexed but dont appear by keywords in searches anymore&#8230;though google web master says all the pages are indexed, i think i am on filter but what is the reson i dont understand. I never sell links&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Filters - An Update on the Recovery Process! &#187; UK Affiliate Marketing Blog - Kirsty's Affiliate Marketing Guide - Affiliate Stuff UK</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-3626</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Filters - An Update on the Recovery Process! &#187; UK Affiliate Marketing Blog - Kirsty's Affiliate Marketing Guide - Affiliate Stuff UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/?p=174#comment-3626</guid>
		<description>[...] promised I would keep a bit of a log on this blog about the process I&#8217;m going through to try and sort out some Google filter issues my lingerie website has been suffering from. I&#8217;ve now spent almost a week working my way [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] promised I would keep a bit of a log on this blog about the process I&#8217;m going through to try and sort out some Google filter issues my lingerie website has been suffering from. I&#8217;ve now spent almost a week working my way [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsty</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-3622</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirsty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/?p=174#comment-3622</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ami. Well, the thing about this blog is that it pretty much is my stream of consciousness.  I don&#039;t have any paying sponsors, so what you get is whats on my mind.  When you&#039;re 5 weeks off your wedding, and moving house in 3 weeks... that&#039;s what the posts end up being about!

Normal service will be resumed shorty, do not fear.  I&#039;ve a lovely post about the different Google filters and how they manifest half finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ami. Well, the thing about this blog is that it pretty much is my stream of consciousness.  I don&#8217;t have any paying sponsors, so what you get is whats on my mind.  When you&#8217;re 5 weeks off your wedding, and moving house in 3 weeks&#8230; that&#8217;s what the posts end up being about!</p>
<p>Normal service will be resumed shorty, do not fear.  I&#8217;ve a lovely post about the different Google filters and how they manifest half finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ami</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>Ami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/?p=174#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>Hi and thanks for this really cool post. Lately there have been a few person posts which , don&#039;t get me wrong, are fine. But the honest truth is it is for the marketing banter that I visit this site

Anyway to my comment, Can&#039;t help but notice the comments on link exchange pages. Is this refring to reciprocal links amd if so, do people still use Reciprocal links? The little SEO I know indicates that they may not be as valuable as they once were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi and thanks for this really cool post. Lately there have been a few person posts which , don&#8217;t get me wrong, are fine. But the honest truth is it is for the marketing banter that I visit this site</p>
<p>Anyway to my comment, Can&#8217;t help but notice the comments on link exchange pages. Is this refring to reciprocal links amd if so, do people still use Reciprocal links? The little SEO I know indicates that they may not be as valuable as they once were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-3618</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/?p=174#comment-3618</guid>
		<description>Hi all

If any anyone has a reference url for the rules re frequency of links and the various &#039;link text&#039; issues Kirsty mentions, I&#039;d be grateful if it could be posted thanks.

- M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all</p>
<p>If any anyone has a reference url for the rules re frequency of links and the various &#8216;link text&#8217; issues Kirsty mentions, I&#8217;d be grateful if it could be posted thanks.</p>
<p>- M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-3617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/?p=174#comment-3617</guid>
		<description>Will look out for your next post... a couple of other changes I had made in the weeks leading up to my site before the penalty:

1) Removal of &quot;disallow&quot; in robots.txt for the jump pages. Before G could not follow my aff links... I stupidly took this off. 

This may be relevant for the reasons Sean stated. My site also has content... but it has a LOT of aff links too.

2) I had a recip link page, but only 4 links or so, for a couple of days, I just deleted it.

3) I had a couple of posts on my compeitor&#039;s with lots of free links out to my competitors on those pages those pages.... the intention was to make it look like a resource, but I think it may have been taken as a recip spam thing... I have now no followed those links.... and may delete next week if I see no change.

That said, those posts have been up for some time, although... I use DD-Post Shift to rotate older posts, and both these posts were at the top of the blog page at the time...

*********

I think the thin aff site thing may have a lot to do with it... I have just disallowed the jump pages again, but am unsure whether that will make any difference.

I have the same issues you do with seemingly irrelevant pages outranking specifically targeted ones on certain queries.

My organic G traffic has pretty well gone, just as I was starting to make some sales from it :-(

Sooo... wishing us both luck :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will look out for your next post&#8230; a couple of other changes I had made in the weeks leading up to my site before the penalty:</p>
<p>1) Removal of &#8220;disallow&#8221; in robots.txt for the jump pages. Before G could not follow my aff links&#8230; I stupidly took this off. </p>
<p>This may be relevant for the reasons Sean stated. My site also has content&#8230; but it has a LOT of aff links too.</p>
<p>2) I had a recip link page, but only 4 links or so, for a couple of days, I just deleted it.</p>
<p>3) I had a couple of posts on my compeitor&#8217;s with lots of free links out to my competitors on those pages those pages&#8230;. the intention was to make it look like a resource, but I think it may have been taken as a recip spam thing&#8230; I have now no followed those links&#8230;. and may delete next week if I see no change.</p>
<p>That said, those posts have been up for some time, although&#8230; I use DD-Post Shift to rotate older posts, and both these posts were at the top of the blog page at the time&#8230;</p>
<p>*********</p>
<p>I think the thin aff site thing may have a lot to do with it&#8230; I have just disallowed the jump pages again, but am unsure whether that will make any difference.</p>
<p>I have the same issues you do with seemingly irrelevant pages outranking specifically targeted ones on certain queries.</p>
<p>My organic G traffic has pretty well gone, just as I was starting to make some sales from it <img src='http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sooo&#8230; wishing us both luck <img src='http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Affiliate Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-3615</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Affiliate Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/?p=174#comment-3615</guid>
		<description>Duplicate content probably is one of the main causes, you said earlier in your post you thought it could be keyword density have you checked to see whether your keyword density is at an ok level?  there is a really useful online resource do you use one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duplicate content probably is one of the main causes, you said earlier in your post you thought it could be keyword density have you checked to see whether your keyword density is at an ok level?  there is a really useful online resource do you use one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsty</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-3611</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirsty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 09:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/?p=174#comment-3611</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg,  It is one or two factors surrounding content being featured on multiple pages.  I am going to do another post updating on what action I&#039;ve taken and the improvements (if any!!) arising from that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg,  It is one or two factors surrounding content being featured on multiple pages.  I am going to do another post updating on what action I&#8217;ve taken and the improvements (if any!!) arising from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/google/dr-kirstys-google-filter-diagnosis-more-site-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-3609</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatestuff.co.uk/?p=174#comment-3609</guid>
		<description>What was the consistent filter application pattern you found?  I am following this thread with great interest.  Thank you for sharing with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the consistent filter application pattern you found?  I am following this thread with great interest.  Thank you for sharing with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

